by Ramus et al.
Summary
A multiple case study was conducted in order to assess
three leading theories of developmental dyslexia: (i) the
phonological theory, (ii) the magnocellular (auditory
and visual) theory and (iii) the cerebellar theory.
Sixteen dyslexic and 16 control university students were
administered a full battery of psychometric, phonological,
auditory, visual and cerebellar tests. Individual
data reveal that all 16 dyslexics suffer from a phonological
de®cit, 10 from an auditory de®cit, four from a
motor de®cit and two from a visual magnocellular
de®cit. Results suggest that a phonological de®cit can
appear in the absence of any other sensory or motor
disorder, and is suf®cient to cause a literacy impairment,
as demonstrated by ®ve of the dyslexics. Auditory
disorders, when present, aggravate the phonological
de®cit, hence the literacy impairment. However, auditory
de®cits cannot be characterized simply as rapid
auditory processing problems, as would be predicted by
the magnocellular theory. Nor are they restricted to
speech. Contrary to the cerebellar theory, we ®nd little
support for the notion that motor impairments, when
found, have a cerebellar origin or re¯ect an automaticity
de®cit. Overall, the present data support the
phonological theory of dyslexia, while acknowledging
the presence of additional sensory and motor disorders
in certain individuals."
University students with dyslexia were compared to a control group without dyslexia. Both groups were given a variety of tasks: phonological, auditory, balance/cerebellar, language-related.
"16 dyslexics out of 16 had
poor performance in phonology, 10 in audition, four in
cerebellar function and two in magnocellular vision."
Showing posts with label ramus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ramus. Show all posts
Monday, October 5, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
